Carl Tashian

« news warriors | Main | musicplasma »

Feb 19 02004 4.37p

Yeah! it was available! So I took it. and I put a site there. Ok, not much of a site. But BS will be a site before it’s a book. Books cost too much to make, waste too much paper, aren’t incrementally updateable, and so on. So I’ll stick with a site until it gets popular enough for a book… or just falls apart.

Meanwhile I need to come up with a tagline for Boston Secrets. You know, like “boston secrets: blah blah blah”

I hate taglines.

Here are some thoughts. Boston Secrets:

… finally told.
… finally revealed.
… for past and present residents.
… for resident presidents.
… a guide for residents.
… a guide for presidents.
… please don’t tell anyone.
… listen closely.
… shhhh!
… self-exemplifying.
… the residents’ guide.
… not a travel guide.
… not for tourists. (can’t use this, because of these people)
… seek them out.
… know them.
… what’s worth it.
… an organized city guide.
… is a such dumb idea.
… I hate taglines.
… fuck this, this is bullshit.
and of course
Freddie’s Funnel Cake Emporium (offered by Freddie)

Also, received my 10D camera yesterday. I’m not going to post bad photos taken while screwing around with it so far, but I will say that I’m thrilled. Great image quality, usability (it behaves exactly like a really nice SLR: an actual shutter that pops up, almost no AF lag, no shutter button lag whatsoever, etc), and compatibility with every other (Canon) thing I own.

I do wonder, though, if this kind of digital SLR, which is basically a regular SLR with a CCD and LCD screen instead of film, will last much longer. It seems like they’re taking an old technology and changing it just enough to merge with a new technology. In the future will we be rethinking the digital camera into something entirely new? Maybe an all-digital digital camera?

It’s interesting to note what isn’t made useless by CCDs. These things probably aren’t going out of style in the next 50 years:

- lenses. digital won’t slow the demand for good glass.
- as long as you have a lens, you’ll have apeture, focal length, and shutter speed.
- which means mechanical parts are needed to stop down the lens and to move the curtain, at the very least, though something like LCD windows might eventually offer a solid-state answer.
- the shutter button isn’t going anywhere.
- you always need more light (especially with the tiny lenses and CCDs made today), so you’ll always need a flash mechanism.
- the need for a tripod might be reduced with technology, but definitely not eliminated.
- and there has to be a way to see the results. so printers and digital picture frames aren’t going anywhere.

Comments

Feb 20 02004 4.17p
phredx #

How ‘bout:

Boston Secrets: Carl’s Bad-Ass Caverns of Bean Town See the Light!

Feb 21 02004 1.00p
Whitney #

I think “ass caverns” and beans are not a best-selling combination. I personally like “fuck this, this is bullshit.”

Feb 21 02004 2.32p
Andrew Reitz #

Boston Secrets: You’re not welcome.

-or-

Boston Secrets: A howto guide for linking the Red Sox, but not letting it drive you crazy.

-or-

Boston Secrets: who’s your daddy?

-or-

Boston Secrets: who loves ‘ya, baby?

-or-

Boston Secrets: What “the man” doesn’t want you to know.

Okay, enough slacking (for now)…

-Andy.

Feb 23 02004 1.14p
phredx #

Well, it’s actually a permutation of Carlsbad Caverns…

Leave a comment

(required)

(required)